Our Right To Keep And Bear Arms Will Not Be Infringed…

We will defend ourselves with any weapon that we choose. I advise you to not find out what happens when you attempt to strip us of our 2nd Amendment right. We will defend you and our community with any firearm we choose regardless if you like it or not. We are law-abiding citizen with razor blade perception and we know exactly the difference between wrong and right and will not allow anyone to dictate to us otherwise.

America needs to make a crucial decision now. Are we going to embrace complete freedom or not? Firearm ownership is our constitutional right. Creating all these gun free zones and restrictions in a culture where guns are legal complicates and creates huge problems. In other words, it’s like a half way free country. (That doesn’t work) We need to embrace complete freedom and the right to keep and bear arms anywhere we want. Gun free zones create a danger zone for the people that are in the zones. Because guns are legal as they should be and is our constitutional right, guns are very easy to get including for psychopaths so as a result these wackos go into gun free zones and shoot people, wear as if complete freedom was embraced, individuals could defend themselves against such psychopathic morons and could neutralize the enemy quickly. We immediately could more effectively combat this continuing threat of psychopathic gun violence. More guns equal less violence. I believe in absolute complete freedom to possess and keep any firearm and the right to possess and keep them anywhere. We already know that a complete ban of firearms not only does not work, but it’s also unconstitutional. So the opposite must be embraced. The complete right to possess any firearm in any public location and those rights shall not be infringed upon by any group or individual. Embrace true Liberty and true Freedom.

It’s common knowledge among the FBI, law enforcement agencies and informed citizens, that countless amounts of people every year are saved by firearms, drastically outnumbering the amount of people unjustifiably killed or even injured by firearms. With strict gun control laws, the level of crime and murder skyrocket, wreaking havoc on law enforcement and society. The mainstream media wants to paint a picture that we have an epidemic of gun violence and an epidemic of mass murder. But that’s all either gross ignorance, or fear mongering and propaganda for an overall larger picture of disarming the American citizens.

The obsession, especially with particular Democrats about gun control as a solution to the crimes in our country that happen with guns should be troublesome to everyone, including people that may not agree with the Second Amendment. The reason why this is troublesome, and regardless of your stance on the Second Amendment/gun control, is because the issues that we are having with violence are not really truly being addressed and have little to do with the tool (the gun). Your public servants are looking the wrong way and leading you the wrong way. And as a result, violence will not decrease. And will also only increase if their gun control measures are put into place. Here are some of the real problems and solutions:

#1. GANGS & THE WAR ON DRUGS: First of all, it’s important to be aware that more crimes are foiled by guns than occur by guns. But the primary legitimate issues concerning gun violence that does need to be addressed is with handguns, not “assault rifles.” The primary issue with gun-related crimes occur with handguns, and are Gang Related activity. The real issue with this aspect of gun violence is with the growing gang activity in our country. We have gang members killing each other over turf wars related to the failed War on Drugs. If we want to take true meaningful steps to end these kind of gun violence, we need to end the war on drugs, not the Second Amendment. And we need to secure our borders, which is a whole other discussion but certainly related.

#2 PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS: One common thing that all these mass shooters have in common, not including the terrorist attacks, are individuals heavily drugged up on pharmaceutical drugs that are supposed to relieve they’re psychotic symptoms but in fact have the opposite effect. These drugs also tend to disconnect the individuals using them from normal human emotions such as empathy and coping mechanisms. These drugs are killing people and are what we really need to put our focus and attention on. Not gun control.

#3 STATE-SPONSORED TERRORISM: The fountainhead of Islamic extremism that promotes and legitimizes terrorism spawns from the fanatical “Wahhabi” strain of Islam centered in Saudi Arabia. These are the Mercenaries/Rebels/Terrorists that the West (The U.S.) & Gulf States fund to fight proxy wars around the world for geopolitical aspirations such as competing pipelines and the petrodollar monopoly. And as a result, other terrorist organizations and lone wolves spawn and or are created. If the world wants to eliminate such violent extremism, it must confront this primary host and facilitator of terrorism that both Gulf States and the U.S. sponsor.

Most people have no clue what an “assault” weapon is or isn’t. They also have no idea about the true stats of how many people are tragically killed unjustifiably by firearms and by what kind of firearms. Rifles (including the AR-15) statistically are the safest because they are not as easily concealable as a handgun. Far more people every year are unjustifiably killed by handguns not “assault” rifles. Also and most important, far more people’s lives are saved by defending themselves and or others with all types of firearms, then people who are unjustifiably killed by firearms. So let’s sum this up, far more people are killed by handguns than ANY kind of rifle, and far more people’s lives are saved by firearms then are murdered by firearms.

It is important to understand what an assault weapon isn’t. The terms “assault weapon” and “assault rifle” are often confused. The term “assault weapon” didn’t used to exist in the lexicon of the firearms community. It is a political term, developed by anti-gun hacks to expand the category of “assault rifles.” So if an assault weapon is not an assault rifle, what is an assault rifle? Example; M4A1 carbine. It is a U.S. military service rifle. It is also an assault rifle. The M4A1 is FULLY automatic. Which means it fires multiple rounds each time the trigger is pulled. Up to 950 rounds per minute.

The infamous AR-15, is a semi-automatic. Which has been demonized and completely misrepresented. This gun fires one round each time the trigger is pulled. It can fire between 45 and 60 rounds per minute depending on the skill of the user. This rate of fire is comparable to other semi-automatic firearms, but pales in comparison to a fully automatic true assault rifle, some of which can fire more than 1,000 rounds per minute. The AR-15, so-called assault weapon is not a machine gun or an assault rifle at all. What political tools call “assault weapons” function like every other normal firearm, they fire only one bullet each time the trigger is pressed. Unlike automatics (machine guns), they do not fire continuously as the trigger is held. In America, most handguns are semi-automatics, as are many long guns, including the AR-15. Some of these guns look like machine guns to appeal to gun hobbyist but they do not function like machine guns.

And remember, you are far more likely to be killed by a handgun then any rifle. And a firearm is far more likely to save your life than to murder someone. And there’s a huge list of things you’re far more likely to be killed by than any guns including car crashes. But I won’t get into all the nuances and details of that, you can school yourself and free yourself of ignorance on your own.

Click Here For Cited Source (Isaac Cubillos) For What An “Assault” Weapon Is And Isn’t

And to me the argument that the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to Modern Weaponry because the founding fathers had muskets and didn’t realize the kind of weapons that would develop, is as stupid as saying that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply to modern technology like computers because when the founding fathers said “Papers and Effects” they didn’t have the foresight to see computers. It’s just an asinine dumb argument. The founding fathers knew damn well technology would advance and their principles would still apply to modern weaponry and new inventions that were yet to come.

Just so I can be very clear on my stance when it comes to guns and gun control. I believe in force and defense equality. I don’t believe any individual regardless of their position in this realm should be allowed to have any kind of weapons or means of defense that is above mine or any other responsible law-abiding citizen. No man will possess anything in this physical realm that I cannot. I reject that concept on principle.

Just so you have a little insight into my mind and my perception of this realm and existence in general. I believe that I am just as intelligent, capable, and of sound judgment has anyone on this planet and I will never allow anyone to dictate to me otherwise. Sometimes it feels like there is an organized direct plan to attack my identity, individualism, self-awareness, and my very existence itself. I will not allow myself to succumb to a slave mentality or a sheeple state of existence that must comply with the collective’s dictates of morality and acceptance. I am above all of that. This is my state of mind and this is the state of mind that I want for all of humanity. Humanity will never break the physical restraints that keep them in perpetual bondage until they first free their minds.

It’s often quite pointless to argue with people that try to dictate to you their standards of morality. They always try and act as though they have the moral high ground. That somehow your morality that is based in the true principles of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a threat to theirs. They will try and convince you of complete ridiculous nonsense like strict gun control, or stripping you of other rights. I know the difference between right and wrong, when and when not to use a firearm, what different types of firearms are appropriate for certain situations and which firearms I’d prefer for a given situation. I understand the dangers of not having a firearm, as well as having a firearm and the responsibilities that accompany firearm ownership. I know how to defend myself and my community and I will not tolerate politicians or individuals telling me otherwise.

​I believe in absolute freedom as long as it does not infringe on others rights. I am not afraid of true freedom. I think many people don’t value or even understand what true freedom is and what it means. I will not sacrifice it for perceived security. And anyone that would sacrifice any of their Liberty and Freedom for a little bit of perceived safety and security deserves neither and will have neither. Embrace complete Liberty and Freedom and do not infringe on others Liberties and Rights under any circumstances.

Unfortunately, part of the downside of living in a culture that embraces true Liberty and Freedom, is that there is in fact tragic events that do occur time to time. Because safety is never guaranteed. But I assure you that the tragedy and the tragic events that occur when we do not embrace true Liberty and Freedom are far worse than the dangers that accompany a culture that embraces true Liberty and Freedom. We have the right to pursue happiness and safety but happiness is not a right and safety is not guaranteed. And we have the right to pursue our happiness and safety by utilizing the Second Amendment and practicing our right to possess and carry firearms of any kind. This is all part of the message that we are trying to educate people about as far as what Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness truly means. Embrace these basic principles for Humanity

– Michael Vincent –

(F.B.I. STATISTICS PROVE; MORE GUNS, LESS CRIME:

Despite the onslaught of media propaganda in support of the Obama administration’s anti-second amendment agenda, the statistics clearly illustrate that gun control does not reduce violent crime and in fact has the opposite effect.

Violent crime offenses in the U.S. have been falling since 2007. The 5-year trend clearly shows that, despite there being an ongoing national debate about gun violence in America, violent crime itself is actually becoming less of a problem.

The Department of Justice also highlights the fact that over the last 40 years, the amount of guns in America per 1000 people has increased, whereas serious violent crimes have decreased.

And despite the media drumbeat that murders involving guns represent the number one safety threat to American citizens, the reality is completely the opposite. Among the “top ten killers” in the U.S., homicide by firearms is at the bottom of the list, according to figures from the CDC and the FBI. Almost 20 times more people die in the U.S. from medical errors than they do from firearm homicides, but there is no outcry to slap draconian regulations on the medical industry.

Cited Source For FBI Stats… Infowars

Alex Jones On Piers Morgan…

Feel Free To Comment

comments